AddThis

Share |

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

CONDITION OF BAIT

The initiate shall solemnly promise:

I That he/she shall abstain from Shirk (association of any partner with God) right up to the day of his/her death.
II That he/she shall keep away from falsehood, fornication, adultery, trespasses of the eye, debauchery, dissipation, cruelty, dishonesty, mischief and rebellion; and will not permit himself/herself to be carried away by passions, however strong they might be.
III That he/she shall regularly offer the five daily prayers in accordance with the commandments of God and the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him); and shall try his/her best to be regular in offering the Tahajud (pre-dawn supererogatory prayers) and invoking Darood (blessings) on the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him); that he/she shall make it his/her daily routine to ask forgiveness for his/her sins, to remember the bounties of God and to praise and glorify Him.
IV That under the impulse of any passions, he/she shall cause no harm whatsoever to the creatures of Allah in general, and Muslims in particular, neither by his/her tongue nor by his/her hands nor by any other means.
V That he/she shall remain faithful to God in all circumstances of life, in sorrow and happiness, adversity and prosperity, in felicity and trial; and shall in all conditions remain resigned to the decree of Allah and keep himself/herself ready to face all kinds of indignities and sufferings in His way and shall never turn away from it at the onslaught of any misfortune; on the contrary, he/she shall march forward.
VI That he/she shall refrain from following un-islamic customs and lustful inclinations, and shall completely submit himself/herself to the authority of the Holy Quran; and shall make the Word of God and the Sayings of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) the guiding principle in every walk of his/her life.
VII That he/she shall entirely give up pride and vanity and shall pass all his/her life in humbleness, cheerfulness, forbearance and meekness.
VIII That he/she shall hold faith, the honor of faith, and the cause of Islam dearer to him/her than his/her life, wealth, honor, children and all other dear ones.
IX That he/she shall keep himself/herself occupied in the service of God's creatures for His sake only; and shall endeavor to benefit mankind to the best of his/her God-given abilities and powers.
X That he/she shall enter into a bond of brotherhood with this humble servant of God, pledging obedience to me in everything good, for the sake of Allah, and remain faithful to it till the day of his/her death; that he/she shall exert such a high devotion in the observance of this bond as is not to be found in any other worldly relationship and connections demanding devoted dutifulness.


(Translated from Ishtehar Takmeel-e-Tabligh, January 12, 1889)

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Pakistan and the 'Ahmadis': The right to believe

The Pakistani flag is one-third white; the color is supposed to represent the rights of religious minorities. The acts and constitutional amendments that undergird the persecution of Ahmadis are therefore contradictory to the very essence of the country’s formation.

For the Ahmadiyyah Muslims of Pakistan, life is spent in a constant struggle. I myself was born into a Sunni Muslim family in Pakistan, hence I didn’t understand how tragic the reality of persecution is for a religious minority in Pakistan until I investigated the matter personally. Being part of the mainstream circles of society did not prepare me for the realization of the atrocities being carried out under the umbrella of protection of the Pakistani Government.

Following the news one can see clearly that the Ahmadiyyah (also known as the Qadianis) community of Pakistan is under a constant threat. Not only is their persecution common. It is sanctioned by the state under the Anti-Qadiani Ordinance of 1984 and Pakistan’s Blasphemy Law. One may even consider this to be the most organized, large-scale pattern of discrimination against a people anywhere in the world. Under these acts, they are not allowed to call themselves Muslims or behave as Muslims in any way, as it is the Pakistani government that now solely defines who is ‘Muslim’ and who isn’t in Pakistan. Over the last 60 years, numerous figures have played important roles in the systematic and long-term attacks on the sect. The Jamat-e-Islami, Maulana Maududi, and General Zia-ul-Haq have all played key roles in inciting mob violence and the widespread discrimination against the Ahmadiyyah movement. Last year alone saw the deaths of 11 members of the community due to sectarian violence, two of them doctors.

In my quest to better understand the cruel nature of the interaction between mainstream and minority, I recently took a trip to the hometown of the Ahmaddiyyah movement in Pakistan, Rabwah. It is also known as Chenab Nagar, a name forced upon the area by the government after it had already been named Rabwah. After the partition in 1948, the members of this movement fled Qadian in India to settle in Pakistan and bought this section of land from the government. At the time the region was practically a desert, populated only for the mining of granite.

About 2 hours from Lahore, Rabwha is the home of large numbers of Pakistani Ahmadis. The movement’s headquarters are also located here, and the Ahmadis’ numerous humanitarian causes are run from here. I was lucky enough to be shown around town by some locals.

My trip began at the local graveyard, a well-maintained operation. Immediately I was made aware of the kind of hardships faced by the Ahmadis. When we came upon the graves of some of their most revered personalities I saw how far the persecution goes. On their tombstones and many others in the graveyard were white markings, blanking out parts of the texts written on them. On inquiry I learned that the local district Nazim (mayor), a Sunni Muslim, had sanctioned the blanking out of any text on any Ahmadi grave which even in the least implies that they were Muslims. On one grave in particular this made no sense, that of the only Nobel Laureate from Pakistan, Professor Abdus Salam, which read:

“Professor Abdus Salam, First (blanked area) Nobel Laureate”

The word ‘Muslim’ was blanked out.

I then went into town to a guest house to get settled in. Here I found out that Rabwah runs one of the country’s best charities. Darul Ziafat is a center where free food and an overnight stay are provided to anyone in need. One even has the choice of being served free food in one’s room or at a table.

There are also commercial centers in the city along with a municipal library, a hospital (which offers pro-bono services), and colleges. What I observed as a stark difference between this and other cities of the same calibre in Pakistan was the presence of women. Living in Pakistan, even in the urban centers, one gets used to seeing far more men in public places than women. Yet in Rabwah women seemed to be out in public in numbers almost equal to those of the men.

A fact worth mentioning is that Rabwah’s infrastructural development can almost solely be attributed to the Ahmadi community. Any time the government has stepped in to take over development operations, the result has been less than satisfactory, as those projects often grind to a standstill owing to a lack of competent administration. For example, the college for girls was taken over by the government during General Zia-ul-Haq’s regime, after which it only declined in its standard of education, maintenance, and facilities. In financial and administrative terms, Rabwah is run entirely by donations of members of the Ahmadiyyah community.

Yet one cannot ignore the background tension which is obvious in the air here. This community is constantly under scrutiny and violent attack from the extremist groups that live in neighbouring settlements. A large part of the land which was fairly bought and paid for by the Ahmadiyyah community has been encroached on by the government. Similarly, the Rabwah town council is known for its corrupt officials who charge the locals exorbitant fees for “Plan Approvals” and levy high taxes, and then pocket the money themselves.

Some Sunni clerics from neighbouring areas have even been routinely known to distribute pamphlets to people passing through, discouraging them to partake in any business dealings with the locals because the money will be a means for the propagation of anti-Islamic teachings and practices. Similarly, the crime committed in Rabwah can be solely attributed to non-Ahmadi Muslims from the area.

On the day of our departure from the town I intended to take some pictures of the main areas to accompany my report. But just after taking about three pictures from a moving car me and my friend were stopped by a few men who drove up to us in a car and were clearly part of the town’s security. They immediately asked who we were and what we were doing there. After we had been cleared, they told us that they have to be very careful these days, as the situation in town is worsening in terms of the citizens’ security. We were then politely asked, for security reasons, to request the permission of the city council to take pictures. This one incident alone makes crystal clear the kind of constant threat that the town’s people live under.

For decades now, the Pakistani government and its state-funded institutions have been responsible for persecuting the Ahmadi people for their interpretation of Islam. It even demands that every single Pakistani passport holder declare on a signed affidavit that Ahmadis are non-Muslims. The points on which the Ahmadis differ from the rest of the Muslim community are few, yet integral. The most important is that Ahmadis stand for a couple of things that would shake the pillars on which clerical Islam is based - namely, a belief in the individual’s right to interpret the instructions of the Quran and a conviction that interpretations of the Quran need to be reviewed according to the spirit of the times.

The Ahmadi community doesn’t believe in violence and openly opposes the waging of “holy war” against anyone. They believe that the spread of education and human rights is the only “Jihad” left to be fought. Humanity First is a non-profit Ahmadi human-rights organization that operates in all the red-alert zones of the world.

Yet most Pakistani Muslims support the notion that Ahmadis are non-Muslims and believe in punishing them when they practice Islam openly. Even members of the educated classes believe that they are the nation’s least deserving minority. They argue that it is the duty of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to define the religion.

The question is not only whether Sunni Muslim beliefs or Ahmadi Muslim beliefs are the true Islamic beliefs, as there is currently also a split between Ahmadi schools of thought. The splinter group calls itself the Lahore Ahmadiyyah movement. The real question is whether there should be state-sanctioned persecution of a group of people by a country that justified its very existence on the basis of the persecution and unfair representation of the Muslim population of the subcontinent?

The Pakistani flag is one-third white; the color is supposed to represent the rights of religious minorities. The acts and constitutional amendments that undergird the persecution of Ahmadis are therefore contradictory to the very essence of the country’s formation.

A similar situation can be observed in Europe, where people like Kurt Westergaard and Geert Wilders are facing the consequences of expressing their opinions. I do not agree with what either of them believes, and it is for just that reason that they must not be prosecuted or attacked for it. Because as long as they are free to exercise their freedom of opinion, I am free to exercise mine.

Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad: Twentieth century Islamic reformer

Bashiruddin spoke out against the rise of Communism in the 1940's. He in fact postulated that Communism as a political and economic system would not survive into the 21st century. His words proved prophetic with the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989. His work The Economic Structure of Islamic Society was praised for its ability to describe salient features of Islam when compared with purely Liberal economics on one hand and Communism on the other.

In the wake of Ian Smith's series in The New Statesman on Modern Muslim Intellectualism. I felt the need to tackle the overly political nature of the "reformers" that Smith selected. Fifty years ago this year, the world witnessed the passing of a great Islamic reformer Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad (b.1889). Despite his lackluster acceptance within the body politic of Islam, Bashiruddin Ahmad (1889-1965) was by far the most prolific scholar, orator and strategist of Islam in the 20th century. His actions continue to define Islamic communities and experiences the world over. Born in British India in 1889, Bashiruddin led an international struggle to establish the true Qura'nic principles of Islam that lasted more than 50 years.

Ahmad's focus was primarily theological. His work centralized the spiritual Islam rather than political or ideological iterations. As the Khalifa of the true Islam Bashiruddin's arguments and ideas remain at the forefront of the corpus of many mainstream writings and discourses on Islam. His writings include a five volume 2900 page commentary of the Holy Qur'an in English as well as a larger multi volume commentary in Urdu. Bashiruddin supervised the translation of the Qur'an into more than 14 languages. His collection of Urdu writings on Islam has been compiled into 19 volumes. Bashiruddin also wrote a corpus of poetry. He gave regular speeches as well as sermons on Islamic theology, eschatology, science and mysticism. Arguments from his Introduction to the Study of the Holy Qur'an and Muhammad in the Bible are rehashed within Muslim proselytizing circles often without credence to the fact that they were his original defenses of Islam.

Like many 20th century Islamic thinkers, Bashiruddin saw the struggle of Islam in modern post colonial societies. As a result of the complexity of the time he did not limit his work to theology or to promoting the imposition of a politicized Islamic sharia on the masses. Instead he waged an idealogical battle with the pen. His aim was to demonstrate that Islam was not incompatible with modern society. He extended the application of the Qur'an to science, politics, international relations, economics and sociology.

Bashiruddin spoke out against the rise of Communism in the 1940's. He in fact postulated that Communism as a political and economic system would not survive into the 21st century. His words proved prophetic with the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989. His work The Economic Structure of Islamic Society was praised for its ability to describe salient features of Islam when compared with purely Liberal economics on one hand and Communism on the other.

As a twentieth century reformer in Islam, Bashiruddin engaged Muslim clerics across the spectrum as well as Christians, Hindus, Jews and Atheists. Ahmad saw his role as conciliatory, he engaged in interfaith discourses and dialogs with a view of bringing people of different faiths together. In this act he also saw himself as revolutionary because embedded in his aims was the desire to bring people closer to God consciousness. In 1921 Bashiruddin wrote a book entitled "A Present to the Prince of Wales". It was presented on a silver studded tray to the Prince of Wales who later became King Edward VIII.

Bashiruddin did not argue for the establishment of a political caliphate and the imposition of Sharia law. In fact he taught the world that the Islamic caliphate was established after the death of a prophet not on the political machinations of a certain group or class of individuals. For him the Islamic caliphate already existed and would continue to exist. Individuals would choose to come under the governance of the caliph not based on force but by choice. To enlighten the world about these teachings Bashiruddin laid the groundwork for the preaching of Islam within this vein throughout the world. The first mosque established in the UK was on account of the efforts of Bashiruddin Ahmad. He himeslf travelled there in 1924 to visit the Religions conference where he delivered a paper on the subject of Ahmadiyyat the True Islam.

Bashiruddin established Islamic missions in more than 40 countries. Under his guidance a network of missionaries departed from his center in Pakistan to the rural villages of India, parts of Africa and Europe. Bashiruddin's missionaries established the first organized Muslim communities in the United Kingdom, Western Europe, the Caribbean and the United States. Under Bashiruddin's directions Islamic communities were developed from the Fiji Islands in the far east to the Caribbean Islands in the far west.

The result of one such missionary's efforts - Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was the establishment of the first organized Islamic community here in St. Louis. Mufti Muhammad Sadiq served as a missionary in the United States under Bashiruddin Ahmad's orders from 1920 to 1922. Under Ahmad's guidance, Sadiq established the headquarters of the mission in Chicago Illinois. In around 1922 a Mr. P. Nathaniel Johnson was appointed a Shiek on behalf of Bashiruddin's mission here in St. Louis. Sadiq describes Johnson a.ka. Sheik Ahmad Din as a "zealous worker for Islam."

Today when we talk of Islamic reformers the world remains preoccupied with Muslims who are limited in their impact to the pseudo-theological or political sphere. The work of Bashiruddin was both theological as well as secular. Bashiruddin took active steps to support the cause of Palestinian nationalism, Pakistani nationalism and Indian nationalism. His envoy Zafrullah Khan engaged the world at the United Nations in support of Palestianian statehood. Despite his righteous indignation at the treatment of the Palestinians, Bashiruddin maintained a conciliatory relationship with the state of Israel. To this day the Islamic mission he established at Haifa remains active and engaged in interfaith work.

Like Smith's series, today's press and media are replete with stories of the need for Islamic reformation. Before we reinvent the wheel we might want to take a look at those reformers of Islam who have had positive and far reaching impact. Perhaps they have laid the groundwork for a reformation that is already underway.

Monday, March 1, 2010

AHMADIYYA AND NON AHMADIYYA DEBATE

Ahmadiyya vs Non-Ahmadiyya Debate on the Topic of Death of Jesus (as) between A Non-Ahmadiyya Debater Qari Aalim & Hafiz Muzaffar Ahmad/Mubashir Kahloon.T Debate is based on Jesus is dead.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

RESPONSE TO JAVED GHAMDI

AHMADIYYA RESPONSE TO JAVED GHAMDI'S COMMENTS ABOUT AHMADIYYA KHILAFAT 1/2

Part 1/2 Ahmadiyya response to a recent comment made by Javed Ghamidi about the concept of Khilafat in Islam and in particular Islam Ahmadiyya. Any sane person with the true righteousness and purity of heart would see the obvious folly of Ghamdi on the issue and the truthfulness of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. May Allah guide you all.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

AHMADIYYA KHALIFA'S RESPONSE

AHMADIYYA KHALIFA'S RESPONSE TO MULLAHS IN EXPRESS NEWS PROGRAM POINT BLANK


WHO IS MUSLIM? Hadhrat Ameerul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih the fifth, Hadhrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad (ATBA) responded to the Mullahs in a recent Pakistani channel program hosted by Mr Mubashir Luqman. Mr Mubashir Lucman showed immense courage and dignity by asking a very valid question from the Mullahs. One of the Mullahs tried to justify the act of erasing of Kalima by stating that he or his Mullah friends hold the "copyright" / "patent" of the Kalima and hence Ahmadis must not use it. Watch this whole video to get the response to this statement.

Ahmadiyya - Messiah Has Come

Ahmadiyya - Messiah Has Come (Part-1) {Ahmadi Qadiani}



Why qadianis (ahmadies) are non muslim?

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Ahmadiyat about JESUS IS DEAD

JESUS IS DEAD

Role of Anti-Ahmadiyya Mullahs vs Ahmadi Muslims

Role of Anti-Ahmadiyya Mullahs vs Ahmadi Muslims in Pakistan Movement and support of Qaid-e-Azam

"son of Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad"

so called "son of Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad" - named AbdurRehman Exposed by Anti-Ahmadiyya itself


"no-fear-policemen" and Mullahs - Islam Ahmadiyya

"no-fear-policemen" and Mullahs - Islam Ahmadiyya


AHMADIYYA KHALIFA ABOUT MR ALTAF HUSSAIN'S LATEST STATEMENT

AHMADIYYA KHALIFA ABOUT MR ALTAF HUSSAIN'S LATEST STATEMENT (ISLAM AHMADIYYA)

Ahmadis believe in Kalima & finality of Prophet

Ahmadis believe in Kalima & finality of Prophet

DIFFERNT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT OPINION ON AHMADIYAT

AHMADIYAT IS THE TRUE ISLAM BUT DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS

SOME OF THE VIDEOS ARE HERE:::::
THEY ARE WRONG PEOPLE TEACHING WRONG LESSONS TO GENERAL PUBLIC